Cases Determined by the St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri Volume 117 by Missouri Courts of Appeals
---------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Missouri Courts of Appeals
Number of Pages: 262 pages
Published Date: 13 Sep 2013
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
Publication Country: United States
Language: English
ISBN: 9781236772541
File size: 23 Mb
File Name: Cases.Determined.by.the.St..Louis,.Kansas.City.and.Springfield.Courts.of.Appeals.of.the.State.of.Missouri.Volume.117.pdf
Download Link: Cases Determined by the St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri Volume 117
---------------------------------------------------------------
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1906 edition. Excerpt: ... period of limitation of the instrument itself.. So it is held that a surety, on payment of the debt, does not become, -ipso facto, subrogated to the rights of the creditor, but only acquires a right to such suhrogation (Hull v. Sherwood, 59 Mo. 172), which he must as Burrus v. Cook. sert before his legal remedy is barred. Junker v. Rush, 136 Ill. 179; Johnson v, Belden, 49 Iowa 301; Bittenhouse v. Levering, 6 Watts & Serg. 190; Joyce v. Joyce, 1 Bush. 474. And so Judge THOMPSON states the law in Bauer v. Gray, 18 M'o. App. 170. So it is said by Judge NAPTON that "The right of a security to recover from his principal the amount which he has paid in his behalf, is a right which may be established in a court of law; but his right to stand in place of his creditor, as to all securities, funds, liens, and equities which he may have, is a right which can only be established in a court of equity." Miller v. Woodward, 8 Mo. 169, 175. In undertaking to defend the position that subrogation of a surety operates to place him literally in the creditor's shoes, with all the rights of the creditor, and to make him literally the owner of the creditor's claim (a note for instance) as though he were an ordinary assignee, and therefore entitled to the period of limitation prescribed for a note, one is led into the most unreasonable, illogical and inconsistent positions. Thus a creditor has the right, of course, to recover the full amount of the note, but the surety is not permitted "to speculate ofi his principal" nor his co-surety, and can recover no more than he has been compelled to pay for him. As, if the surety should compromise or otherwise adjust the note at less than its face, he can recover no more than he...
Read online Cases Determined by the St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri Volume 117
Buy and read online Cases Determined by the St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri Volume 117
Download Cases Determined by the St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri Volume 117 ebook, pdf, djvu, epub, mobi, fb2, zip, rar, torrent
Download to iPad/iPhone/iOS, B&N nook Cases Determined by the St. Louis, Kansas City and Springfield Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri Volume 117
Similar entries:
Servants of the Sharia : The Civil Register of the Qadis' Court of Brava 1893-1900 ebook
Trends in Deaths Associated with Abuse of Volatile Substances: June 1997 Report 10 download PDF, EPUB, Kindle
Download PDF, EPUB, MOBI Handbook of Dam Engineering
Big is Better 2 download PDF, EPUB, Kindle